Well my estimate on getting the house finished was optimistic. Maybe Friday. Ugh, it will have to be Friday because after that we will have run out of money. Jon and I have successfully avoided credit card debt and we're not going to start now.
I never did comment on the elections, did I? Well I was disappointed when Daniel Craig was selected. When the Broccolis were talking about a 'younger' Bond, I was expecting very young, like mid-20's. I was hoping they'd consider Mathew MacFadyen. Technically Craig is younger than Pierce Brosnan, but he's still not what I pictured. Oh, okay, Daniel Craig is not very good looking. At least he doesn't do it for me. I have to admit, though, no Bond ever did it for me except maybe Timothy Dalton and he lasted for only 2 movies.
But the reviews for
Casino Royale indicate that this might be the Bond movie I've been hoping for all my life. I'm not really exagerrating -
Dr. No came out 2 years before I was born and I can recall seeing every Bond movie that came out in the theater since
The Man with the Golden Gun. Yes, I saw every single Roger Moore Bond, the best of which was
The Spy who Loved Me. It was all downhill from there but I sat through them all.
When Dalton took over, I was so optimistic.
The Living Daylights is still one of my favorites - the script seemed to care about the story and characters (well, in the context of James Bond movies).
License to Kill, however was a total mess so exit Mr. Dalton. Pierce Brosnan I like so I was happy to see his Bond movies starting with
Goldeneye but they slowly deteriorated and he lasted for 4 movies - I saw every single one of these in the theater, though.
So here we are at
Casino Royale, a new Bond with reportedly all the crap jettisoned and I'll probably have to catch it on DVD because Monkey boy is just not ready to sit in a theater seat for 2 hours.